Thursday, May 31, 2007

Ron Rege Jr.













One of the most dazzling artists to emerge from Massachusetts in the past decade is Ron Rege Jr. And he emerged right the hell out of here. But he returns as the percussionist and artist for the sweetiepie band Lavender Diamond, which plays at Boston’s Museum of Fine Arts tomorrow.

Rege grew up in Quincy and Plymouth, studied at MassArt, and from 1988 to ’98 lived in Mission Hill and Cambridge, which is when we became friendly. He was part of the rocking and widely influential Boston-Providence art-comics scene of the past decade, whose most well known (art world) denizens are Fort Thunder and Paper Rad.



Inspired by E.C. Segar’s “Popeye,” Rege plumbed the abstractions of the cartoon language – particularly all the floating geegaws – to create a psychedelic Cute Brut style that shimmers with longing and worry and awe. He shifts back and forth between autobiographical tales and unnerving apocalyptic fantasies, like his book “Skibbber Bee-Bye,” which was published by Tom Devlin’s now-defunct Highwater Books in Cambridge in 2000 (Devlin also published my work) and has since been republished by Montreal’s Drawn & Quarterly.

Chris Ware blurbed it: “Ron Rege Jr. is probably the greatest 'new cartoonist' (whatever that is) I can think of. In the tradition of ‘pioneers’ like Herriman, Sterrett, McCay, et al, in that he has wholly reinvented the comic strip language to suit his own idiosyncratic vision; his apparently simple yet beautifully complex little line drawings seem to spring from the very essence of ‘the form.’”

Rege decamped to the San Francisco Bay Area in 1998, but returned East for a stint in Wakefield, Rhode Island, in 2003 and ’04. He has since lived in Los Angeles. Lately, he’s published “The Awake Field" and new editions of his ongoing series “Yeast Hoist." And he’s in fine form in his album art (reproduced with permission here) for Lavender Diamond’s EP “The Cavalry of Light,” which was reissued by Matador Records in January, and album “Imagine Our Love,” which Matador released May 8.



Nicholas Kahn and Richard Selesnick











Nicholas Kahn and Richard Selesnick’s show “Eisbergfreistadt” at Pepper Gallery spins a tall tale of a giant iceberg, loosed by “heat from factory smoke,” that ran aground in a German port in 1923. As they imagine the story, chamber of commerce types declared it a free trade zone – the Iceberg Free State of the title – and currency called notgeld was issued. The iceberg became a tourist destination. It inspired artists to utopian city planning, and their designs were reproduced on the currency, which inflation made worthless. The iceberg broke in two during a masked ball. Half melted. The rest drifted back to the arctic, with revelers stranded on its icy hills. And so on.

Kahn, who lives in Brooklyn, and Selesnick, who resides in upstate New York, met while studying at Washington University in St. Louis, where they both received BFAs in 1986. They’ve both spent time on Cape Cod over the years.

Kahn and Selesnick have collaborated for two decades. Recent projects have imagined a journey to the moon where astronauts found stranded Edwardian space explores and an Indiana Jones-type of adventure in Middle Eastern deserts.

Here Kahn and Selesnick’s three main panoramic color pictures, which appear to be a concocted from Photoshopped photos and watercolor matte paintings, give glimpses of what happened after the iceberg floated back to the frozen North. A guy in a polar bear-coat paddles a snakeskin kayak over ice. Men in fur coats and animal masks play cards for heaps of worthless currency inside an iceberg cavern. Rescuers arrive via sea plane and dig out a man frozen beneath the ice.

In the gallery stands an actual wooden wheelbarrow piled high with bundles of the “worthless currency,” and a man’s coat and woman’s dress made from the bills. Black and white photos depict a massive iceberg rising behind the steeples of a town, a seaplane perched on the ice, ladies burning cash in a fireplace.

“Eisbergfreistadt” is an elaborate allegory about global warming and the follies of capitalism, tourism and art. It plays fun philosophical games about “worthless” money that is actually art and thus not so worthless. The wheelbarrow full of the stuff is priced at $20,000. The story could be an outtake from Michael Chabon’s new novel “The Yiddish Policeman’s Union,” a murder mystery set in an imagined teeming Jewish safe haven in Alaska. The stagy pictures look like Edward Gorey on ice. It’s amusing, but all the showy intellectual gymnastics wind up feeling forced.













Kahn/Selesnick “Eisbergfreistadt,” Pepper Gallery, 38 Newbury St., Boston, May 4 to June 9, 2007.

Pictured from top to bottom: Detail of “Seeflashe (Sea Plane)”; whole “Seeflashe (Sea Plane)”; “Notgeld Ansammlung (Notgeld Collection)”; installation shot of “Mantel Notgeld der Manner (Men’s Notgeld Coat),” “Notgeld Kleid (Notgeld Dress),” RadfaB (Wheelbarrow),” and Kartenstapeles (Deck of Cards); detail of “Kartenspeil (Card Game)”; and “Schlangeboot (Snake Boat),” all 2007.

Friday, May 25, 2007

Bread and Puppet protests















Bread and Puppet Theater, the landmark political protest theater based in Glover, Vermont, was at the head of a march through Boston’s Roxbury and South End neighborhoods on May 6, protesting a high-security biolab for studying extremely deadly germs that’s under construction at Boston University Medical Center on Albany Street in Roxbury. (It’s right behind Boston's South End arts district.)

Bread and Puppet’s street theater action, performed over and over during the march, consisted of businesspeople led by Santa Claus pulling paper masks over other performers’ faces. Then these folks walked about like stiff-jointed robots, while the businesspeople opened their briefcases to display charts of skyrocketing profits. But the robot people revolted, pulling off their masks, throwing them to the pavement and stomping on them.

Putting it into words it sounds pretty straightforward – people under the spell of big business and Santa (think capitalist greed) come to reject these forces – but on the street it felt strange and nonsensical and not specific to the day’s theme. Bread and Puppet founder Peter Schumann (here playing the straw-masked Santa) has struggled with his metaphors of late.

















I don’t mean to overemphasize Bread and Puppet’s role in the event, they were just one part of the group involved (the Globe report put participants at about 150). But there were many Bread and Puppet-style costumes and giant puppets in the march – the “Property of Genzyme” mutant, the big blue person, the giant skeleton. For most part these weren’t directly affiliated Bread and Puppet, though many were operated by Bread and Puppet alums. It was more a sign of the influence Bread and Puppet has had on protest style, particularly in New England, since it formed in New York City in the 1960s.














































Oh, this final photo shows local protest organizer Klare Allen of SafetyNet being interviewed before the march began by a television reporter. I just love the expression on the reporter’s face – it was the expression she wore the whole time.

Photos by Greg Cook.

Keiji Haino plays Cameron Jamie’s ‘JO’

















Here’s my report on Japanese noise rocker Keiji Haino performing an improvised live score for Cameron Jamie’s film “JO” at MIT’s List Visual Arts Center in Cambridge on May 17.

Here’s my report on and review of the Jamie exhibition, which continues through July 8.

Photos by Mark Linga, MIT List Visual Arts Center.

Thursday, May 24, 2007

Update: Curatorial change at BCA?

Laura Donaldson, director of the Boston Center for the Arts’ Mills Gallery, is scheduled to leave the BCA at the start of August.

Here’s my previous post on this.

RISD MFA Thesis Exhibition


















The standouts among the 120 masters students featured in the Rhode Island School of Design’s “Annual Graduate Thesis Exhibition” at the Rhode Island Convention Center are Rachelle Beaudoin and Millee Tibbs. As I write in my review:

Beaudoin presents funny-smart snapshots (at top, left and below) showing her wandering local streets and Providence Place mall wearing “Cheer!Shorts” with slogans printed on the butt. You’ve seen ladies wearing shorts with some saucy adjective (“juicy,” “luscious”) on their behinds. Beaudoin pushes this sexual signaling further with her ass poetry: “Pussylicious” and “Totally Waxed.” It’s righteous when she wears pink “Unusually Wet Pussy” shorts while checking out the Victoria’s Secret window.












It’s surreal when she wears them while browsing the refrigerator section of a convenience store. And it’s giggly and uncomfortable when she wears “Cock Sucking Queen” shorts white waiting for Ben & Jerry’s ice cream in front of a mother with two boys. “Cheer!Shorts” evolved from a classroom performance last fall (check out her blog), and it’s better and more charged by moving into public with her disconcerting questions about feminity, feminism, and the differences between our fashions and the way, say, female chimps’ butts turn pink when they’re in the mood for love.














Tibbs Photoshops portraits of herself into snapshots of herself when she was a little girl. In then-and-now pictures, she lays on the floor with other kids in what looks like a classroom, talks on the phone in a kitchen (above “Millee talking to Daddy, 2007”), and poses with a dog. Things get wicked weird and interesting when she reenacts nude pictures. A little kid naked and mugging in a sudsy tub is cute, but a grown woman in the same pose is something else altogether. (At left "Millee lying on her back 1979, 2006.”) Paired, these images speak about girlhood versus womanhood, about childhood sexuality, and about society’s infantilization of womanly sexuality.

“Rhode Island School of Design Annual Graduate Thesis Exhibition,” Rhode Island Convention Center, 1 Sabin St., Providence, May 17 to June 2, 2007.

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Curatorial change at Boston Center for the Arts?

Change is coming for visual arts leadership at the Boston Center for the Arts. The nonprofit has begun advertising for a new “visual arts manager” to oversee programming at its Mills Gallery beginning Aug. 13. There have been rumors for a while that gallery director Laura Donaldson would be leaving, but my (admittedly limited) reporting has been unable to get a straight on-the-record answer.

For example, when I asked BCA communications manager Rob Watson yesterday via email when Donaldson’s last day was and what the staffing shift would mean for BCA programming, his response was:
The Visual Arts Manager position is actually a different job from Laura’s position of Mills Gallery Director and reflects a number of shifts that are happening across our programming department – affecting all performing and visual arts programs at the BCA. These shifts will go into effect in the fall, but we’ll be announcing the new structure on May 30. So stay tuned for an update then!
To me, the posting for the visual arts manager sounds a lot like Donaldson’s job but with more words in the official title – but even if it isn’t, a new visual arts manager means new leadership at the BCA.

Donaldson has declined to talk publicly about the matter over the past few months – and didn’t respond to a call and email yesterday. She has been BCA gallery director since 2003 and organized many of the gallery’s exhibits, including “Bruce Bemis: Reciprocal Illumination” in 2005, which was selected as the best show in an alternative space by the New England chapter of the International Association of Art Critics that year. Previously Donaldson spend four years as assistant director of the Montserrat College of Art gallery in Beverly and a year as acting director there.

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

ICA windows

One more thing about Justin Davidson’s New Yorker profile of ICA architects Ricardo Scofidio, Elizabeth Diller and Charles Renfro of New York…

The architecture trio had planned to place view-constraining film over the panoramic window facing Boston harbor in the ICA’s Founders Gallery at the end of the fourth floor. This lenticular film would have acted as blinders, allowing you to look directly out, but not side to side. As you walked the length of the gallery, you could take in the panorama one slice at a time, but never all at once. It’s another example of the architects’ desire to control and alienate users of their building.

The idea was nixed when Boston Mayor Tom Menino (according to Davidson) or maybe it was “board members and staffers” (according to the Globe’s Robert Campbell last November) saw the unimpeded view and thought it a shame to chop it up.

But the window-film plan ain’t quite dead, according to The New Yorker. Davidson reports that Scofidio told him: "They'll do one show and then they'll put the film up."

So will the film be up on the ICA windows soon?

“Right now we have no specific plan to install the lenticular film,” ICA Communications Coordinator Brigham Fay tells me, “but we might revisit the issue in the future.”

Monday, May 21, 2007

S&M starchitecture and the ICA
















When I panned the new Boston Institute of Contemporary Art building (above) in January, I seemed to be the lone dissenter in a sea of critical raves. But now Philip Nobel has an essay in the May issue of Metropolis magazine (thanks to Geoff Edgers for pointing it out) that makes many of the same criticisms of the ICA that I made, and goes on to argue that gushing critical response to new starchitecture has promoted a cycle of flashy but lousy buildings.

Nobel writes: “Bad buildings by big names get a regular pass. Favorable coverage ensues for the client. Though no connection between high-glamour architects and high-quality buildings is ever demonstrated, the client class learns anew that it pays to gamble on the stars. Other architects retool their practices to get in the game (first stop: drinks with the local critic). Students take note (fledgling critics too…). Mediocrity goes unchecked.”

Nobel runs though a list of possible reasons that critics praise poor architecture (he fails to cite specific examples beyond the ICA). One of his most fascinating suppositions is that journalists get suckered by how buildings look in photographs. He writes of the ICA’s cantilever: “the grand gesture to the sea looks great in pictures, and that serves architects and critics (and their photo editors) alike.” Or maybe it’s just that critics “imagine that promoting innovation—even just the look of innovation—is such a pure good that the defense of all other values must be suspended along with our disbelief?”

Perhaps. But Nobel seems to assume that critics are giving passes to buildings they don’t actually think are great. I think critics honestly like these buildings – they just have poor taste. And this poor taste tends in a certain direction.

What stands out in Justin Davidson’s May 14 New Yorker profile of ICA architects Ricardo Scofidio, Elizabeth Diller and Charles Renfro of New York is their fondness for purposely frustrating gestures that fight and blight their structures’ surroundings. Renfro says their style is like Rem Koolhaas and other “programmists,” meaning, in Davidson’s words, architects who arrive “at a form by assessing a client’s specific needs.”

“”Programmists have a social approach,” Renfro tells Davidson. “They’re saying that life is the interesting part, not the building.” This is a funny-strange bit of double-speak, because it’s the opposite of how they design.

Davidson describes their 1990 plan for the Slow House in the Hamptons, which never got built. The location had a lovely view of the ocean, but “The house’s piece de resistance was a monitor placed directly in front of the window, displaying a live video of the same view. The collector could stand in his living room just before dusk, and gaze at a reproduction of the sunset blocked by the screen. This was both more than a house and less – an irritatingly clever demonstration of the postmodern theory that all seeing is ‘mediated,’ and all views the product of someone exercising control.”

Or as Diller describes their 1987 installation “The withDrawing Room”: “It was about alienation and control of your space.” The problem with Diller Scofidio + Renfro-style architecture is their need to dominate the end user and that their primary tactic is alienation.

The art world – critics included – loves dominating, controlling, alienating stuff – it’s a key factor in much avant-garde art of the past century. Call it S&M style. But what can come across as “challenging” in art is another thing altogether as a permanent edifice. It’s partly a difference of the length and scale of the audience’s engagement with the thing. In a building that will likely stand for a century or more, alienating design becomes a long-term abusive relationship. It’s antisocial and mean – the opposite of what you’d want in a civic building. So why does the style persist? Could it be, as a friend of mine argues, that the popularity of S&M architecture is not just a fluke of taste, but is a display of capitalist force, an expression of project funders’ desire for social domination and control?

The glittering, jagged Rem Koolhaas-designed central public library in Seattle received raves like the ICA when it opened three years ago this Wednesday. In March, Seattle Post-Intelligencer critic Lawrence Cheek revisited the building for a “post-occupancy evaluation.” He continued to praise the “crystal palace”s “stunning skin,” but noted that the building has an “unwieldy and baffling vertical traffic flow” and restrooms are poorly placed.

And then he lowered the boom:
This library, incredibly, is an uncomfortable place to read. The third-level "Living Room," which has the feel of a vast indoor park, is not conducive to intimacy with a book. It harvests and energizes routine noise; conversations from hundreds of feet away coalesce as ambient babble. The vast overhead space, a thrill to library visitors, works against readers – most of us instinctively crave small, private spaces when curling up with a book. And "curling up" here is no fun. The foam seats are decidedly unpleasant and are looking shabby – cracked, torn, stained – after three years.
Critics, like everyone else, get dazzled by sensational design. And they face the problem of trying to divine how a building will function before people are actually using it. If more critics revisited architecture (and art) for Cheek’s sort of retrospective reviews perhaps it would help us all see with clearer eyes and better predict how designs will feel and function once they are built – and maybe even head off some poor designs before they get built.

What will we think of Boston’s ICA three years from now? I still feel strongly about my criticisms of the ICA building, but six months after the opening I find I misunderestimated the importance of the theater, which takes up about a quarter of the building, in the new ICA’s mission. I’m still not hot for how the theater design functions, but its programming – particularly dance shows – seems to be the sharpest, most daring stuff coming out of the ICA. And I’m curious to see how the public exterior spaces play now that it’s finally getting warm enough to use them.

Here’s my previous post on this topic.

Thursday, May 17, 2007

Cameron Jamie















Cameron Jamie’s legend precedes him – like the tale of when he wrestled “Michael Jackson.” As the story goes, back in the mid-‘90s, Jamie often spent his lunch hour outside the Hollywood Wax Museum watching a Michael Jackson impersonator until one day Jamie asked him, “Hey, you want to wrestle.” And “Michael Jackson” said, “Sure.”

“Honest to God,” Jamie insisted when he told me about it recently at MIT’s List Visual Art Center, where the 37-year-old’s first American museum retrospective, organized by Minneapolis’ Walker Art Center, is on view through July 8. I reviewed the exhibit this week (recommended); here I’ll focus more on Jamie’s background.

Jamie’s work often takes the form of documents of dark underground middle class rituals, the weird messy stuff churning below our neat social veneer. In his 1996 video “The New Life,” he and the Jackson impersonator wrestle in Jamie’s Los Angeles apartment. Jamie resembles a scrawny version of Leatherface from The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, wearing longjohns, a rubber novelty butt, and a creepy self-portrait mask that he commissioned from a wrestling-mask maker in Mexico. Punctuated by Jackson’s trademark squeals, their grappling, grunting, and panting has a sexual air. It nails our craving for connection with pop celebrities and the wondrous strangeness of “Wacko Jacko.” Underneath lurk questions of how we forge our identities — Jamie with his masked shenanigans, Jackson with surgery, and the look-alike impersonator with his act. Jamie recalls, “I asked him, ‘So is this like the weirdest thing you’ve ever done?’ He said, ‘No, not at all. I once had to do a striptease for a rich Saudi Arabian oil tycoon.’ ”

Jamie is a lanky guy with a chin full of black stubble and wavy dark brown hair cut long like a ‘60s psychedelic rocker. When we chatted at MIT on May 1, he was dressed all in black save for blue denim coat. He has the enthusiasms and expertise of a hipster geek connoisseur of trash culture, and the corresponding revulsions at the vapid entertainment stuff usually plastered across the covers of pop culture magazines.

He grew up in Northridge, about 25 miles northwest of Los Angeles in California’s San Fernando Valley, shuttling back and forth between his divorced parents. Mostly he hung out in his bedroom playing records and drawing. “Music was like my salvation growing up. … Music was like what kept me going,” Jamie tells me. As a teenager, he began photographing spook houses. “No one seemed to acknowledge or think much of those places outside of frame work of Halloween culture,” Jamie says. Here at the uncharted fringes of pop culture, in horror movies, amateur haunted houses, wrestling, rock and roll and underground comics, Jamie he found kindred spirits and inspiration.

As a teenager, he ingratiated himself to oddball adults like “The Simpsons” creator Matt Groening and punk cartoonist Gary Panter. He met Groening when he arranged to interview the “Life in Hell” cartoonist for a report for his high school newspaper, which never was published – Jamie says, “They wouldn’t publish it because it had ‘hell’ in it.” And he was impressed with Panter’s comic “The Asshole,” saying: “To me one of the biggest artistic influences on me was the fact that a crude comic book like ‘The Asshole’ existed.” (Above, "Snacks for a Ventriloquist," 2005, ink on paper mounted to wood.)

Jamie says he met the flamboyantly ghoulish R&B singer Screaming Jay Hawkins by showing up early for his concert with gifts of a rubber snake and a shriveled up apple “head” that he’d made with his Vincent Price Shrunken Head Apple Sculpture kit. “That’s how I got into the show, because they were 21 and over bars. I carried in equipment. I was like a roadie. That changed my life,” Jamie says. “Seeing Screaming Jay Hawkins coming out of a coffin to perform looked like the greatest job in the world.”

Jamie says he similarly befriended Sun Ra, who performed free jazz dressed in a combo of Egyptian and space garb. “He really taught me a lot about doing my own thing, to always follow my own direction and instinct. That no one is going to make your vision happen, and you just have to do things on your own,” Jamie says. “I was really amazed that band like that could even exist on this planet. …. He was an absolute huge influence on me with his philosophy.”

Jamie was dumpster diving all over LA and the San Fernando Valley in the late ‘80s, digging treasures out of school dumpsters. “When I was in junior high I was kind of studying junior high kids because their book reports and notebook journals were so funny and absurd,” Jamie says.


Jamie attended a public high school in Reseda, California, and beginning in junior high spent his summers working in a used record store. “I didn’t know what I was going to do after high school. Because there was no encouragement for what I was doing. So I thought, ‘I guess I’m going to continue to work at the used record shop and make art.’” Then a high school photography teacher said, “You should go to art school because there’s a lot of weird people who you can connect with.” (Above, "Frozen Ghost," 2001, oil on paper mounted to wood.)

He was accepted into Cal Arts, but couldn’t afford to go. But he cobbled together loans and began classes in his early 20s when his father threatened to throw him out if he didn’t got to college, or the military. He was interested in film and music, in trying out equipment he wouldn’t otherwise have access to. But he butted up against the school’s “post-conceptualist” bent. “At the time, it was a very strict and out-dated program. They had rules and there are no rules for anything in my book,” Jamie says.

So he says he hid out in his studio – the first space he had for art-making outside his bedroom – talking to few people and rarely attending class. He was already beginning to exhibit at underground spaces. And he began making “telephone” portraits like “Six Composite Heads” (1987-‘88), in which he commissioned a street artist to draw portraits of papier-mâché heads he had fished out of a school dumpster.

“It was like a game of telephone. I was always interested in urban mythology, when things are completely degraded and distorted, but yet would take on another life and meaning,” Jamie says.

“I was looking particularly for an artist who had problems rendering portraits realistically,” Jamie says. “…All those things that kind of go wrong during the process of art-making is what I elaborate on in my work. Art isn’t any good if it’s too perfect. It doesn’t have any soul. It seems like a lot of contemporary art is so much about being perfect. No one wants to make art with any visions any more. The avant-garde has lost its soul due to bad artists.”


While at CalArts, he worked near Hollywood and Vine, ghost-writing movie reviews. This was when he spent his lunch hour at the nearby Hollywood Wax Museum (his favorite LA museum) watching a Michael Jackson impersonator, whom he later wrestled. (Above, "Wallowing in Pachuco Threads," 2005, ink on paper mounted to wood.)

Jamie says he didn’t show his wrestling videos much, but word got out. Which is how he heard about local teens staging their own wrestling matches in their backyards, a more extreme version of what he’d been doing. “Here I was doing this weird wrestling thing on my own and suddenly here were people in real culture that were doing something similarly weird,” Jamie says. Beginning in 1997, for fun he video taped these contests.

This culminated in his gritty Super 8 film “BB,” 1998-2000 (At top, still from the film; at left, "Studies for BB: Six Portraits," 1998-2000, color photos). Teen boys in masks and painted faces wrestle in a makeshift ring surrounded by one-story bungalows, crashing into each other, leaping off ladders and roofs, bashing each other with metal chairs. “To me the ultimate document of urban primitivism in my work was ‘BB,’” Jamie says. “I realized this is all about ‘primitive’ America.”

He prefers to screen his videos with live musical accompaniment, loud noise rock meant to overwhelm the audience. “BB” has featured performances by the sludge metal band the Melvins, whom he met when he saw them perform in the early 1990s. They drove the whole crowd out except for the sound guy and him. “Any band who can drive an entire audience out of a club is always a good sign for me,” Jamie says.

In 2000, Jamie moved to France. He’d never lived outside LA before. “The Valley really is nowheresville. It’s sometimes impossible to know where it begins and where it ends.” Particularly dispiriting to him were the Valley’s endless strip malls. “It’s kind of like the end of humanity when you see something like that and it’s why I moved out of America. It’s like a country that’s lost its soul.”

“I also decided to move to France because there were no artists moving there. I wanted to move to a really dead art scene,” Jamie says. He likes old things. He likes quiet. “When I moved to France, it made me like people a lot more. I think I was raised in a very unsocialized environment. … You don’t see the world through your vehicle like you do in L.A.” He adds, “I would never want to move back to the Valley again. I don’t think I’ll ever move back to America. It’s too violent. It’s too intense.”















Still, he briefly returned to the LA area in 2002 (or thereabouts) for a project that had him wandering his childhood haunts dressed as Dracula followed by a single witness. And he went to suburban Detroit that fall to film his 2003 video “Spook House” (stills above and second from top), basically a montage of overlapping amateur haunted house skeletons jerking out of coffins, smoke machines, guillotines, electric chairs, flying ghouls, werewolves and demon clowns. A photograph from this project shows a front lawn cemetery with faux tombstones for a fantasy monster and a real-life terrorist. “Now Osama Bin Laden is the new Dracula … They’ll take Osama Bin Laden and include him in a cemetery with other monster characters from popular culture,” Jamie says. “I love the fact that the villainous perception of his image through the eyes of the people in America is seen as though there’s no difference between Dracula, Frankenstein or Osama Bin Laden anymore. They have all reached the same level. And I’m interested in when those things somehow collide, when reality becomes fantasy and fantasy becomes reality.”

“The beautiful thing is people are creating these odd environments entirely themselves,” Jamie says. “The decor of those haunted houses is not my work, it’s somebody else’s work. The way I photographed those places kind of looks like an anonymous photograph, where it doesn’t look too ‘arty.’ … I wanted the viewer to become more intimate with the photos, to go into the pictures somehow, by somehow giving them an authorless quality.”

That December, he borrowed a video camera and visited the snowy Austrian village of Bad Hofgastein to document local St. Nicholas feast day traditions. In the 26 minute video “Kranky Klaus," 2002-2003 (above, still from the video), a man playing the saint, dressed in a pope hat and vestments, visits shops and homes giving out bags of chocolate coins. But he’s accompanied by Krampus, a gang of costumed men that look like evil Wookies with goat horns, chains and clanging bell. While St. Nick placidly stands by, the Krampus wrestle shoppers to the snowy ground. They invade homes and meeting halls, overturning tables, throwing boys to the floor, harassing parents, pulling children’s ears.

“The Krampuses actually attacked and pummeled me. They thought I was crazy when I got back up and continued to film and follow them around,” Jamie says. “Santa Claus with the devil handing out gifts … I like that duality, that somehow good and evil work together. Because you can’t have that here in the States. Everything is either black or white.”

Jamie’s most recent video is “JO” (2004). For the full effect check out the screening with Keiji Haino’s live performance of the score at the List on May 17. An exploration of patriotic rituals, it combines footage of a Fourth of July hotdog eating contest in New York with French celebrations of Joan of Arc. The connection between Joan of Arc and eating contests in “JO” relates to the local vernacular in his childhood neighborhood, in which Joan of Arc-style french fries were boiled in oil extra long so they’d be extra crispy.

“I think ‘JO’ is my most violent film,” Jamie says, “especially with the hot dog eating contest. Just the subject matter, the metaphors, the gestures, the eating, the consuming.”

“Cameron Jamie,” MIT List Visual Art Center, 20 Ames St., Cambridge, May 5 to July 8, 2007.

Photos courtesy of the Walker Art Center and MIT.

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Artadia grant winners announced

Congratulations to the ten winners of the inaugural round of Artadia foundation grants for Boston-area artists, which were announced yesterday.

The big winners are Helen Mirra, the collective The National Bitter Melon Council and Mary Ellen Strom, who will each receive $15,000. Hannah Barrett, Gerry Bergstein, Xiaowei Chen, Jane Marsching, John Osorio-Buck, Vaughn Sills and Stephen Tourlentes will each receive $1,500.

The 10-year-old Artadia foundation has given grants to Houston, San Francisco and Chicago artists, but this is the first time the New York-based organization has awarded grants to Boston-area artists. The winners were chosen from nearly 700 applicants by Pieranna Cavalchini, curator of contemporary art at Boston’s Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum; Michael Darling, contemporary curator of the Seattle Art Museum; and Rene de Guzman, visual arts curator of San Francisco’s Yerba Buena Center for the Arts.

Laura Donaldson, director of the Boston Center for the Art’ Mills Gallery, is scheduled to curate and present an exhibition of the winning artists’ work during the summer of 2008. And an illustrated catalogue of the stuff will be published.

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Käthe Kollwitz






















The Portland Museum of Art’s current exhibit of Käthe Kollwitz’s prints, which I review here, focuses primarily on the great German political artist’s early etchings with which she made her reputation.

In her 1903 etching “Outbreak,” the revolutionary leader Black Anna waves a motley mob of peasants with pitchforks on to battle in a 14th-century uprising against wealthy landowners. "Käthe once told me that she had portrayed herself in this woman," Otto Nagel wrote in his biography of Kollwitz. "She wanted the signal to attack to come from her."

Examining Kollwitz’s life (1867-1945), I’m struck by a woman who grew up craving a socialist revolution, but wound up stuck in the mess of World War I and World War II.

“Käthe Kollwitz Prints: Defending the Downtrodden,” Portland Museum of Art, 7 Congress Square, Portland, Maine, Feb. 24 to May 27, 2007.

Pictured from top to bottom: "Whetting the Scythe,” 1905, etching with aquatint and some traced lines on paper, and “Self-portrait,” 1934, lithograph.

Monday, May 14, 2007

Art in downtown Providence?

Here’s a little article I wrote about art in downtown Providence. If you follow this stuff, you probably already know that tenants are moving into 19 studio and living spaces that AS220, the city’s landmark downtown cultural center, developed in the former Dreyfus Hotel on Washington Street. But it’s still great news.

And Ari Heckman, of downtown Providence redevelopment juggernaut Cornish Associates, tells me that Cornish hopes to find a collaborator to operate a standing gallery in one of their downtown locations – something like the Space at Alice on Union Street, its joint venture with the Arts and Business Council of Rhode Island that lasted from 2003 until last winter. If you’re interested, contact him.

Friday, May 11, 2007

‘Urban Landscapes’ at Brown


















Here’s my review of “Urban Landscapes: Emancipation and Nostalgia,” a three-person show at Brown University’s Bell Gallery organized by curator Vesela Sretenovic.

The highlight is London artist Catherine Yass’ 2006 video installation “Lock” (above), which puts you on a barge entering the great concrete maw of the 1.3-mile-wide Three Gorges Dam on China’s Yangtze River. Footage is projected on two ends of a darkened gallery. On one side you see the front of the boat, on the other is the view behind; the room in between becomes, in effect, the barge itself.

The lock’s giant gates hem in the vessel as water pours in. Metal squeaks against metal as the boat rises. Bells ring, a voice squawks from a loudspeaker. Tiny sailors meander the decks. After a blackout, gates slowly open in front of the boat, revealing a narrow channel to daylight. The barge chugs out into calm green water that disappears into mist upriver. Behind, boats line up, waiting their turn to enter the astonishingly humongous stone gates. Lock is a cool ride, a meditative version of one of those IMAX films that put you in a jet plane’s driver’s seat.

“Urban Landscapes: Emancipation and Nostalgia,” Bell Gallery, Brown University, 64 College St., Providence, April 18 to May 27, 2007.

Catherine Yass’ “Lock” reproduced here with the very special courtesy of Galerie Lelong in New York.

Thursday, May 10, 2007

2007 DeCordova Annual






















Here’s my review of the DeCordova Museum’s “2007 Annual Exhibition,” the institution’s annual roundup of 10 of the “best, most interesting, and visually eloquent artists who work in this region.” Yippie!

As I wrote in the review, for me the standout is Jungil Hong of Providence. Affiliated with that city’s punky Fort Thunder art gang, she makes eye-popping psychedelic screenprint collages of Hieronymus Bosch-style apocalypses by way of Terry Gilliam’s Monty Python animations. (Pictured at top, “Tree Top Trading Post,” 2006. At left, “Miami Haze,” 2004.) People dressed in chain-mail armor gather eggs and vegetables and hang leaves to dry in landscapes dotted with windmills, malignant clouds, wolf-headed birds, black armies brandishing boomboxes, a leaf woman, a beehive, and giant gulls and crows. A wavy red pattern filling the ground makes the earth look to have been flooded with fire. Her work seems a mysterious allegory, a dream of scratching out an existence in the shadow of looming environmental collapse.

Another highlight is Fitchburg artist Jeff “Jeffu” Warmouth, whose 2007 video "Spudnik" (below) mixes animation and puppetry to tell its fractured tale of a Soviet-styled nation of potato people and their quest for the stars. “The desire for space exploration among the Potatoites has a long and delicious history,” the narrator declaims in that optimistic march-of-progress tone familiar from newsreels and science documentaries. Warmouth’s installation includes rocket models and photos “documenting” the Spudnik program — the “Unmanned Foil Satellite” is a ball of tinfoil with three metal legs that exploded on re-entry because “engineers had neglected to poke holes in the foil to prevent steam build-up.” Warmouth’s project is a light goof on museum displays, filled with groan-inducing puns and charming Sesame Street–style humor. Sometimes it’s too light and silly, but he keeps everything short enough that it doesn’t wear out its welcome.

“The 2007 DeCordova Annual Exhibition,” DeCordova Museum, 51 Sandy Pond Road, Lincoln, May 5 to August 12, 2007.

Erik Levine















One of the best gallery shows in Boston right now is Erik Levine’s “More Man” at Space Other gallery, which viscerally explores one of the chief rights of male initiation in American society today: high school football. Levine, who splits his time between Boston and New York, presents arty documentary photos of a coach looming over a benched player and the shadows of players stretching across the field juxtaposed with slogans splashed across T-shirts and embroidered on hats. They read: “Respect all, fear none,” “Those who stay will be champions,” “The strength of the team is the player, the strength of the player is the team,” and “We turn hatred into motivation.”

The main event is Levine’s 2005 video “More Man.” It’s a grainy color video chopped into staccato floating images. A coach hollers at boys: “Go hit somebody.” A boy tries to rev up his teammates: “Act like they killed your mother.” Coaches shove and punch their players. Players smash into each other in practice. They chant and clap and dance – with associations to clan, tribe and gang rituals made apparent. The violence and anger are ritual – just like the truce after the game when opponents politely slap hands. A coach yells: “This is not how you play football. This is not how you gain respect. This is not how you become young men.” A coach tells boys: “You let this team down.” A coach says, “I will go to the wall for you. I will die for you … but when the year is over decide what you want to do with your life. … Be more man than the next man.”

Here’s the dark heart of manhood as it’s popularly defined in America, where tradition requires adults to be assholes to kids, to shame and humiliate them. It’s a zone where slogans like “There’s no I in team” are not about working together for mutual benefit, but about the obliteration of individuals. It’s an examination of the man in the word “manhandling.” It twists my stomach into knots.

Levine’s editing tricks – like cheap imitations of early music videos – are kind of gimmicky, but the video seeps under your skin. It makes you wonder why indoctrination into manhood, as we often define it, means indoctrination into a code in which “respect” means unquestioning submission to brutal authority. It’s the code of behavior that trains hazers to believe in the righteousness of their cruelty because they’re just reenacting what was done to them coming up. It’s tradition, and tradition is how we maintain and protect our society. It’s such attitudes that make it so hard for our nation to analyze and address, say, the bloody mismanagement of our Iraq war. It’s such attitudes that portray torturers as strong, as clear-eyed, as noble. It’s a sad and sorry state of affairs.

Erik Levine, “More Man,” Space Other, 63 Wareham St., Boston, April 12 to May 12, 2007.

Pictured from top to bottom: “Respect All Fear None,” giclee print, 2006, and “Hatred into Motivation,” giclee print, 2006.

Sexy Joseph Cornell?






















One of the striking things of the Joseph Cornell retrospective at Salem’s Peabody Essex Museum is the sexy collages and boxes he began making in the late 1950s with photos of naked ladies clipped from National Geographic, Playboy and art photography journals.

It's striking because Cornell (1903-1972) is often described as a chaste fellow, an impression promoted by a tale he liked to recount of the time in the 1920s when he tried to make the moves on a cashier who sold tickets in the booth in front of a Queens movie theater. Too shy to actually approach her, he threw a bouquet of flowers to her. Fearing she was being attacked, she screamed, and the manager ran out and tackled Cornell.

“Untitled (Ship with Nude),” pictured above, from around 1965 is among the more modest of his nudes. I don't have any pictures of the real salacious ones, but one features a nude from behind, snipped in half, and pasted into a photo of autumn trees. Another shows a naked lady laying on her side in ocean surf. Cornell added only a little star to her necklace and a bit of ink wash.

Deborah Solomon’s exhaustive and exhausting 1997 book “Utopia Parkway: The Life and Art of Joseph Cornell” reports that late in life Cornell hired pretty young assistants in hopes of sparking "office" romances. This tactic finally paid off when he hired the Japanese artist Yayoi Kusama, then in her mid 20s, to model for figure drawing practice in 1964. Solomon reports she
was happy to disrobe in his basement workshop so that he could sketch her. … Yayoi was the hardly the first woman whom Cornell envisaged as his feminine ideal. Yet she was the first to harbor any sensual interest in him. … She encouraged him to act on his impulses and apparently gave him his first true taste of sexual bliss. He was sixty years old, and finally, at last, he kissed a woman on the mouth and explored a woman’s body with his hands, an experience he described in his diary as gratifyingly “erotique.” … “Cornell was deeply impotent,” Kusama noted. “To have sex with him, therefore, was impossible." (pages 293-294)
Solomon also reports Cornell’s circa 1971 liaison with the writer Leila Hadley, a twice-divorced mother of four, “a radiant and spirited young woman in her thirties. A small, alluring beauty with long brown hair.”
She felt honored to be the object of his desires, and it did not bother her that his needs were unconventional. On one of her visits, Cornell requested that they take a bath together, and she obliged. On another occasion, she treated him to oral sex, reporting years later that he was “fully capable of having an orgasm.” Nonetheless, Cornell had no intention of consummating their relationship the conventional way. He apparently remained impotent, which is to say, incapable of penetration. … Though he recorded “wet dreams” in his diary and apparently enjoyed fellatio, sexual intercourse was out of the question.

Or so he confided to Leila Hadley, offering a rather quaint reason for his abstinence for intercourse. “He felt he would lose his ability to be an artist if he had sex,” she said. (pages 355-356)
Pictured from top to bottom: “Untitled (Penny Arcade Portrait of Lauren Bacall),” 1945-46, and “Taglioni’s Jewel Casket,” 1940.

Joseph Cornell






















Here’s my review of the terrific exhibit “Joseph Cornell: Navigating the Imagination” at Salem’s Peabody Essex Museum, which assembles 180 of his bewitching, dreamy collages and signature glass-fronted shadow boxes, including 30 works that are being shown for the first time.

Joseph Cornell (1903–1972) was the quintessential odd duck, meek and manipulative, a bookworm and a packrat, afraid of eye contact, scared of his own shadow, a Francophile, and a creepy panting celibate voyeur who idealized girls and mooned over Hollywood starlets and 19th-century ballerinas. He was both a recluse and a pal of art stars like Marcel Duchamp.

Cornell’s boxes, so particularly arranged, tap our mind’s insistence on putting two and two together to create narratives even where none exist. Some correspondences are easily deciphered, but the boxes’ power and pleasure lie in how they never fully give up their mysteries.

Cornell has a slight Massachusetts connection. He was a lifelong New Yorker, except for four years he spent studying – and failing to graduate – at Phillips Academy in Andover.

While the MFA’s Edward Hopper survey has lots of flash, the Cornell retrospective is a quiet stunner. Cornell’s work is rarely seen hereabouts – I think the Addison owns something and maybe Harvard.

I’m intrigued by the parallels between Cornell and Henry Darger, Ray Johnson and Andy Warhol – the repeating motifs, the appropriated images. In particular, Darger and Cornell both focus on children, and copy and enlarge appropriated images to assemble elaborate compositions (Darger traced his appropriated images).

These two pages detail some of Cornell’s sources.

“Joseph Cornell: Navigating the Imagination,” Peabody Essex Museum, East India Square, Salem, April 28 to Aug. 19, 2007.

Pictured from top to bottom: “Medici Slot-Machine: Object” 1942; “Untitled (Soap Bubble Set)” 1936; and “Untitled (Cockatoo with Watch Faces)” 1949.